Why understanding adoption enriches our Bible reading

When OT writers use parent-child imagery to describe the relationship between God and Israel were they borrowing imagery from (for want of better terms) ‘biological’ or ‘adoptive’ relationships? For Janet Melnyk there seems to be a preference for the latter.

I’ve been reading Melnyk’s fascinating 1993 essay, “When Israel was a Child: Ancient Near-Eastern Adoption Formulas and the relationship between God and Israel” (see the bibliography page for full details). She uses texts from Israel’s neighbours that record adoption ceremonies or declarations to provide an understanding of the nature and process of adoption of the period in the Ancient Near East. She then shows how parent-child imagery in the OT echoes this language, suggesting that the idea of adoption would have been prominent. Here is her conclusion:

The biblical writers were interested in portraying Israel as chosen and adopted by God. One wonders why the parent-child relationship was often portrayed as one of adoption, rather than one of biological birth. Perhaps because the metaphor of Yahweh as parent is almost exclusively a male image, there must be a mother if Yahweh is to father a nation. Although the land is sometimes given a role, the adoptive process conveniently circumvents the need for a birth-mother, and Yahweh is shown to be capable of every other maternal nurturing. By conceiving the relationship as adoption, God’s election of Israel, his beloved son, was emphasised. This, in turn, distinguished Israel as the people chosen by God over all the nations, and as the recipient of a desirable land for all generations of God’s [extended family] to enjoy. By identifying Israel as God’s child, the biblical writers wrote Israel into a state of legitimacy, recognition, and inalienable inheritance. (p.259)

While it would be possible to overemphasise the significance of some imagery, Melnyk provides an insightful exploration of the adoptive relationship as the background to what is, after all, a central biblical image: God as parent. The adoptive relationship (albeit the Ancient Near East understanding of it) was the normal way of thinking about God as parent and his people as children.

Doesn’t it then follow that the more we understand adoption, the more insight we will gain into the biblical story and our relationship with the God we call Father?

Advertisements

About timjdavy

I teach and research on Bible and Mission at Redcliffe College and lead the 'Bible and Mission' and 'Scripture Engagement' streams of our MA in Contemporary Missiology. I am the Director of the Centre for the Study of Bible and Mission, and also lead Redcliffe's 'Fostering, Adoption and the Church' research project, .
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Why understanding adoption enriches our Bible reading

  1. Pingback: 5 things to think about when preaching on adoption | Fostering, Adoption and the Church

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s